Facebook and other social networks could be replaced with blockchain as a result of a Supreme Court lawsuit.
Centralized social media companies will have a much harder time operating if the Supreme Court decides to repeal Section 230.
The frauds and misdoings of the internet
The web media, perhaps the most important creation in the whole history of humanity, have lost a battle with people’s nature.
Never before has it been simpler to determine whether an opponent is a friend or just a bot.
People are aware that they are constantly being watched in an effort to increase ad conversions.
The nonachievement of the web system is an inevitable result of the big technology monopolies’ inability to validate and safeguard our identities (especially Google and Facebook). But what is the reason behind such facts&
The response is that there is no motivation to do so. In fact, they prefer the status quo because of Section two hundred and thirty of the law, which concerns communication and its appropriate methods.
The bill was passed by the United States Congress in 1996.
Node defeats tech giants like Google and Apple. However, anything can happen at any time.
The Gonzalez Texas case, decided by the Supreme Court this term, is Google, Situations in Which Section 230 Might Be Reorganized or Removed.
It’s challenging to think of a scenario in which the web media services that people use today aren’t destroyed. Blockchain technology has the ideal chance to take its place now.
The way people came here and how to solve the problem
The fact that web platforms are not legally liable for user-posted content, as stated in Section 230, was a crucial component in the early development of the Internet.
As a consequence, web media platforms are able to produce user content (and gain money from it).
The future might be seen as a time for the rapid development of blockchain tech that might completely replace current social media platforms due to better security and privacy tools that are already incorporated into the core of their systems.